by Bill White
International bankers are
financing Brazilian Socialist Party presidential candidate Marina Silva against
Brazil’s Communist Workers
Party president, Dilma Rouseff, in an effort to privatize the Central Bank of Brazil and
bring it further into the Rothschilds’ and Zionists’ international financial
empire.
The Central Bank of Brazil
is currently state-owned and part of Brazil’s Finance Ministry, though it
is semi-autonomous and usury-based, lending rather than spending money into
circulation. Silva wants to transfer the bank to private interests, so that the
Brazilian state can no longer direct its financial policies.
Silva is a black envriornmental activist who has taken a
sudden lead in Brazilian polls. Rouseff is a former Marxist guerrilla. The two
are battling over a country of great contrasts, where an almost 50 percent
black population descends from former slaves, lives in squalor, and is governed
by a prosperous and often ultra-rich White minority—an image of what internationalists
desire for the United States.
But as in many former Communist nations, Rouseff has a
better domestic economic program than her moderate socialist and so-called
moderate “right” opponents. Following the lead of the Soviet Union, which
issued the ruble as an interest-free currency for its captive peoples, Rouseff
has maintained control of Central Bank of Brazil’s current policies. While
Central Bank of Brazil
is semi-autonomous, its chief, Alexander Tombini, is a presidential appointee
and serves at Ms. Rouseff's will.
Silva says that Rouseff has not allowed the Central Bank of
Brazil to raise interest
rates, now 11%, high enough to stem a 6.5% inflation rate, and has not allowed
the value of the real, Brazil’s
currency, to fall against the dollar. When a central bank is state-owned,
interest acts like a tax, with money being collected in interest going out of
circulation as demands for new loan fall. Remarkably, raising interest rates as
Silva desires would likely prevent the value of the real from falling against
the dollar. A falling real would boost exports from Brazil.
In short, Silva’s policies would be unlikely to benefit
workers, as Brazil’s rapidly
growing economy is being fuel by the Central Bank’s easy-money policies, and
unlike the United States,
state ownership is largely preventing further centralization of capital. While
a better policy would be to abandon usury altogether and increase government
spending by the spread between Brazil’s
interest and inflation rates, this is the exact opposite of what Silva
proposes.
So again, the Zionist banking community is using a “first
black president” socialist stage to push its agenda on the world’s workers, all
the while confusing the issues beneath an unnecessarily complex economic
discussion.
Rouseff’s recent campaign ads get it right. Silva polices
“would mean me giving bankers a great decision power over you and your family’s
life, the interest you pay, your job, and even your salary.”