Tuesday, June 2, 2015

China Boots U.S. From Asian Banking System



by Bill White
 
China, working with the governments if the United Kingdom and other European powers, has to moved further boot U.S.-controlled  institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank from Asia, another sign of declining U.S. financial power.
In March, the United Kingdom declared that it would join China and 27 other nations including India, Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, Qatar and Iran, in founding the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, an instrument of Chinese foreign policy in the region. Days later, the UK was joined by Germany, France, and Italy. Led by China members of the bank would lend money to developing nations in Asia for roads, ports, and other infrastructure projects.
The bank builds on expanding Chinese influence in Asia, including Chinese government funded projects to develop a “New Silk Road” through Central Asia, and, Chinese government invests in ports in Sri Lanka and East Africa. China has also been working with Russia, Brazil, India and South Africa to develop the BRICS system, bank and currency investment agencies which would operate outside of the Bretton Woods system. The long term goal of these investments is to reduce American power as the world’s creditor nation and make China independent of the Bretton Woods system established after World War II, that made the world dependent on the U.S. dollar as the medium of global exchange.
Part of this growing independence has also been allowing Central Banks in nations from Australia to Switzerland to issue denominated Yuan. Previously, many Chinese trade transactions had to be conducted in dollars and were dependent upon the Federal Reserve System.
The United States responded to its rapidly diminishing power in East Asia, by demanding that allied nations repudiate their agreements with the Chinese. American concern about diminishing power was cloaked in concern about “banking standards,” with the U.S. claiming that the Chinese will use the banks as the U.S. uses the IMF-World Bank, as an instrument of foreign policy.
“We hope and expect that the UK will use its voice to push for the adoption of higher standards.” Patrick Vertrell, a spokesman for the National Security Council, told the press.
Britain’s decision to join the AIIB followed the failure of the Unites States to prevent its ally, Australia, from joining. Australia initially embraced the bank, then reversed position after a personal appeal from Barack Obama. Now, Australia stated it intends to go forward in joining the bank.
Similarly, U.S. ally South Korea, who had been pressured to repudiate the AIIB, seems likely to repudiate America and join.
The continued economic reorganization of the United States has followed from the country’s 2008 economic collapse and the failure of African-born President Barack Obama to revive the economy. While some major employers have recently raised wages in highly publicized moves, the U.S. economy has entered a deflationary period, with prices now falling at a rate of 0.5% per month, matching an 8% fall in wages since 2008 and a strengthening U.S. dollar internationally. The U.S. Federal Reserve had been staving off deflation by issuing trillions of dollars in additional currency, but, with that having ended, deflationary forces have taken over. Deflation is deadly to usury based economies, particularly ones as heavily in debt as that of the United States, because it makes debts more difficult or impossible to pay.
The rise of Chinese and other banking alternatives has also mirrored the reversal of U.S. power on the ground. Since 2008, the Chinese have pushed the U.S. and its allies back 200 miles from Chinese shores, while Iran’s effectively pushing the U.S. and its allies out of Iraq and Syria, and, Russia has successfully resisted a U.S.-Jewish coup in the Ukraine. To distract Americas from these failures, the U.S. government and its mass media have incited racial problems devoting most TV and print news coverage to largely imaginary negro grievances.

Friday, May 29, 2015

Can O'Malley Slay The Hildebeest?


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-choose-omalley-20150529-story.html

The Baltimore Sun is doing its duty by its old patron What's-His-Face O'Malley and giving him a boost for the Democratic primary. He's supposed to be announcing his official candidacy for President on Sunday. Basically, the Sun points out O'Malley's primary qualification for office: he is not Hillary Clinton. That's enough to get my vote right there, liberal jackass though O'Malley is.

You know, I think it's just possible that the Sea Hag might be knocked off her perch by another challenger, this time an actual heterosexual White male who looks good in a suit, no matter how horrific his actual politics are.

But I thought this time the old harridan really was inevitable? (Snicker snicker). Don't tell me some wicked howwible man is going to try yet again to take away what is rightfully hers? Does he not understand that it is her turn now? Stoopid male thing.


[Giggle]

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

This Might Get Interesting


http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/05/26/America-Ready-Liberal-Rock-n-Roll-President

"Is America ready for a liberal rock-and-roll president?"

America is ready for anybody, Republican or Democrat, who can put the Sea Hag down and bury her in a crossroads with a stake through her heart.

Can you imagine the screams and screams and screams from Salon Magazine and the Huffington Post if the Hildebeest is beaten out in the primaries by a heterosexual White male? God, I'd love to hear that awe-inspiring sound! 

I hope this O'Malley guy goes for it, but we'll see. Remember all those FBI files the Sea Hag and Billyboy helped themselves to all those years ago? And now we learn that she's been running her own private black ops unit headed by the Jew Blumenthal? Let's hope Mr. O'Malley doesn't have anything blackmailable in his closet by way of skeletons. Not to mention the habit the Clintons' critics used to have back in the day, of turning up mysteriously dead.

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Anti-Christian Violence In Palestine




by Bill White

As the Zionists in Palestine bombarded the Gaza Strip, another form of Zionist aggression drew less attention—the continuing Zionist war against both Palestinian Christians and Christianity itself.

On July 17, 2012, Zionist Knesset member Michael Ben-Ari publicly destroyed a copy of the New Testament. “This book and those who sent it belong in the garbage can of history,” Ben-Ari announced as he was photographed destroying the gospel of Christ.

The Bible Ben-Ari destroyed was one of 120 Bibles naively sent to Members of the Knesset by a Christian missionary group praying for their conversion. “This is a provocation by church missionaries,” Ben-Ari declared.

Few Christians would say that receiving a Jewish Torah in the mail was a “provocation”, but other Knesset members shared Ben-Ari’s concern. “It is forbidden to deliver missionary materials to the Knesset”, MK Tzipi Hotolevy of Likud announced in a statement. Hotolevy said that the distribution of such anti-Semitic hate literature as the New Testament would be investigated and prevented in the future.

A scandal in Palestine, the Washington Post gave the incident a paragraph, the L.A. Times several paragraphs, and all other U.S. media outlets hid the story from the American people. But anti-Christian religious violence is on the rise in Palestine. According to Ha’aretz, the Israeli equivalent of the New York Times, a gang of 100 followers of Chabad-Lubavitch Yitzchak Ginsburg, have been linked to 24 attacks on Christian monasteries and churches across Palestine since 2009, including three since March. On May 9, 2014, the Romanian Orthodox Church in Jerusalem was defaced with the words “Jesus Is Garbage” and other spray-painted slogans. On May 5, 2014 “Death to Arabs and Christians” was painted on the Catholic Notre Dame Center in Jerusalem. On March 31, 2014 the words “Jesus Is A Monkey, Mary Is A Cow” were painted on the Deir Rafat Catholic monastery near the city of Beit Shemesh.

While a cracked gravestone in a Jewish cemetery usually draws howls of international outrage, none of these attacks have received American news coverage.

Judaism is a religion of anti-Christian hatred. According to the Talmud, Christians are Edomites, children of the Biblical Esau, and Jesus was a sorcerer who is boiling in pots of feces in hell. [Babylonian Talmud Gittin 56b, 57a] Worse yet, those who question Zionist world supremacy are part of the ancient tribe of Amalek, whom YHWH has commanded Jews to murder.

Chabad-Lubavitch is one of the worst of the Jewish hate groups. It teaches that non-Jews are cattle who were given by YHWH to Noah to rule over as animals.

In the United States, though, knowledge of these Jewish teachings is largely suppressed in favor of a religion called Judaeo-Christianity. Though the Israelites of ancient times were hopelessly dispersed into the cities of the Medes and into Persia, and the few Israelites who returned to Palestine mixed with the Samaritans and Edomites until their bloodline disappeared, the myth that the Jews are the Israelites lives on. 

In fact, most Jews are Ashkenazim, sons of Togarmah and Gomer whom Ezekiel prophecied would seize Palestine just before the revival of true Israel.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

I'm Baaa-aaack...


http://www.nationaljournal.com/against-the-grain/democrats-vanishing-future-20150521

Good article to the effect of how Democrats are actually by no means in the catbird's seat they may think they're in, and how the Hildebeest may be the death of the party yet.

Yeah, this is me renewing my spasmodic commitment to this blog. I won't make any promises this time, because for whatever reason, whenever I get all the other crap piling on me (which is most of the time now) this blog always seems to be what slips through the cracks. But I still think the idea of our participation in real-world politics, as grubby as those politics are, is sound.

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Arresting The Hilbebeest?



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/04/27/264547/gop-has-few-options-to-get-clinton.html

Now they're talking!

Unfortunately, that's all they're doing. Talking. 

No one in the GOP has the balls to arrest the bitch, and more than they had the balls to attempt to arrest the dictator himself when he unilaterally terminated the Constitution and seized power on November 20th, 2014.

Saturday, April 11, 2015

More Hildebeestian Stuff


[Pulled this off Bloomberg. Too lazy to go back and find the link. Bascially, she screwed her own homo supporters for immediate political advantage, which is ironic in view of the fact that the Sea Hag is almost universally acknowledged to be a dyke herself.] 

LITTLE ROCK — A trove of papers released yesterday at the Clinton library shows that, even before homebrew e-mail servers were an option, Hillary Clinton’s operation had mastered low-tech workarounds to avoid leaving a paper trail of her real-time views on controversial subjects.

Even though the First Lady maintained her own correspondence office, in at least once instance, her staffers punted an inquiry about her views on a timely controversial issue then dividing Democrats to her husband’s staff. 

“We have received a few letters on the subject of same-sex marriage,” Alice J. Pushkar of the first lady’s staff wrote to Kyle M. Baker, on her husband’s side of the White House, on September 18, 1996. “I think that it would be more appropriate for a response to come from the President on this than the First Lady. Would it be possible to get a First Lady version of the P-323?”

Later that day, Baker’s office generated a form letter, which is among the hundreds of thousands of previously unreleased papers made public. “Thank you for contacting Hillary regarding marriages of couples of the same gender. She has asked me to respond on her behalf,” read the letter approved for Bill Clinton’s auto-pen signature. “In 1992, I stated my opposition to same-gender marriage, and recently, when the issue was raised in Congress, I said that if a bill consistent with my previously stated position reached my desk, I would sign it.”

A little more than 24 hours after that letter was prepared, Clinton did sign the Defense of Marriage Act, ignominiously doing so past midnight in an empty White House without any cameras present. In a contemporaneous signing statement, a belated effort to placate liberal supporters he knew abhorred the bill, Clinton expressed worry that it could serve to “provide an excuse for discrimination.”

Hillary Clinton appeared to get through the election season without having to commit to a position of her own. In an interview earlier that year with the San Francisco Examiner’s Carla Marinucci, she had said that her “preference is that we do all we can to strengthen traditional marriages” but did not share her view of same-sex unions. Promoting her book It Takes a Village, Clinton told Marinucci that “children are better off if they have a mother and a father,” but also that “there are people who are able to fulfill the functions of child rearing who don’t fit into the traditional pattern.”

Basically, this woman will do anything for power, and she routinely breaks the law in order to cover her tracks. She knows that nothing will be done about it. She's Hillary, and she is exempt. From everything.