[Pulled
this off Bloomberg. Too lazy to go back and find the link. Bascially,
she screwed her own homo supporters for immediate political advantage,
which is ironic in view of the fact that the Sea Hag is almost
universally acknowledged to be a dyke herself.]
LITTLE ROCK — A trove of papers released yesterday at the
Clinton library shows that, even before homebrew e-mail servers were an
option, Hillary Clinton’s operation had mastered low-tech workarounds
to avoid leaving a paper trail of her real-time views on controversial
subjects.
Even though the First Lady maintained her own correspondence office,
in at least once instance, her staffers punted an inquiry about her
views on a timely controversial issue then dividing Democrats to her
husband’s staff.
“We have received a few letters on the subject of same-sex marriage,”
Alice J. Pushkar of the first lady’s staff wrote to Kyle M. Baker, on
her husband’s side of the White House, on September 18, 1996. “I think
that it would be more appropriate for a response to come from the
President on this than the First Lady. Would it be possible to get a
First Lady version of the P-323?”
Later that day, Baker’s office generated a form letter, which is
among the hundreds of thousands of previously unreleased papers made
public. “Thank you for contacting Hillary regarding marriages of couples
of the same gender. She has asked me to respond on her behalf,” read
the letter approved for Bill Clinton’s auto-pen signature. “In 1992, I
stated my opposition to same-gender marriage, and recently, when the
issue was raised in Congress, I said that if a bill consistent with my
previously stated position reached my desk, I would sign it.”
A little more than 24 hours after that letter was prepared, Clinton
did sign the Defense of Marriage Act, ignominiously doing so past
midnight in an empty White House without any cameras present. In a
contemporaneous signing statement, a belated effort to placate liberal
supporters he knew abhorred the bill, Clinton expressed worry that it
could serve to “provide an excuse for discrimination.”
Hillary Clinton appeared to get through the election season without
having to commit to a position of her own. In an interview earlier that
year with the San Francisco Examiner’s Carla Marinucci, she had
said that her “preference is that we do all we can to strengthen
traditional marriages” but did not share her view of same-sex unions.
Promoting her book It Takes a Village, Clinton told Marinucci
that “children are better off if they have a mother and a father,” but
also that “there are people who are able to fulfill the functions of
child rearing who don’t fit into the traditional pattern.”
Basically,
this woman will do anything for power, and she routinely breaks the law
in order to cover her tracks. She knows that nothing will be done about
it. She's Hillary, and she is exempt. From everything.
